Answers · Updated 2026-10-30
How do I handle ITAR-controlled drawings when quoting?
Price one of your own parts: Drop a STEP model or PDF drawing — about 90 seconds, no account.
Your part priced in about 90 seconds, no account.
Treat an ITAR-marked drawing as controlled technical data before you decide how to quote it. Confirm the customer’s authorization and the required US-person access, keep the file in the approved ITAR vault, and do not forward it to a finisher, cloud tool or overseas person without authorization. Then quote the physical routing and the compliance work separately. Worked example: a $150 quote-review and controlled-intake allowance plus 2.0 hours of machining at $125/hour and $40 material gives $440 internal cost before markup; the number is illustrative, while the handling obligations come from the contract and ITAR rules.
See how QuotedPart connects to your workflow with its API, MCP server, autonomous quoting and shop-specific learning.
Stop at the marking and verify the scope
An ITAR marking is a signal to stop ordinary RFQ forwarding. Ask the customer which items and data are controlled, which contract or authorization applies, whether the supplier is expected to be a US person, and how records must be retained or destroyed. A drawing can be both ITAR-controlled and CUI; one label does not replace the other program. Keep the customer’s written answer with the RFQ.
Do not assume that machining in the United States alone solves the issue. An outside processor, inspection lab, software provider or support person may be a foreign person under the authorization terms. If you cannot verify the path, pause the quote or decline it rather than uploading the drawing to a convenient service.
| Gate | Question to answer | Record |
|---|---|---|
| Marking | Which file and revision are controlled? | Drawing, model, email and revision |
| People | Who may access or discuss it? | Approved US-person list or customer direction |
| Systems | Where will it be stored and processed? | Vault, access log and retention rule |
| Suppliers | Will any outside process see technical data? | Vendor authorization and flowdown |
| Quote | What compliance work and exclusions apply? | Assumptions, validity and named contact |
Price the controlled work as its own routing line
The worked example assumes $150 for controlled intake, access review and record setup, two machine hours at $125/hour ($250), and $40 material. Internal cost is $150 + $250 + $40 = $440. A 25% markup would make $550. If the customer requires a US-person outside inspection at $90/hour for 0.5 hour, add $45 before markup; if the vendor charges a $125 lot minimum, use that documented amount instead of guessing.
Whether you show a compliance line to the buyer depends on the contract and your commercial practice. You can include it in an engineering or handling line while stating what is included. Never claim a certification you do not hold, and never imply that a product feature substitutes for your ITAR program.
Control the handoff and close the record
Use a named owner for the RFQ. Keep permissions narrow, disable public links, record downloads and make sure the quote PDF itself does not reproduce controlled technical data. When the job is awarded, flow the marking and handling instructions to every authorized subcontractor. When it is declined or complete, follow the customer’s retention and destruction terms; do not improvise deletion from one laptop while copies remain in email and backups.
Review export-control questions with qualified counsel or an export-compliance professional. The DDTC registration question is separate from whether a particular transfer is authorized, and registration itself is not an export license.
What to do next
Create a one-page ITAR intake gate, train estimators to stop on a marking and keep the customer’s authorization attached to the quote record. If the shop cannot provide the required access and storage controls, say so promptly. A fast no-quote is safer for the customer and for your business than an uncontrolled “budgetary” price.
Illustrative quote assumptions
- • Controlled intake and review $150; 2.0 machining hours at $125/hour; material $40.
- • Optional outside inspection: 0.5 hour at $90/hour, shown separately; 25% markup.
| Line | Calculation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Controlled intake | stated allowance | $150.00 |
| Machining | 2.0 × $125 | $250.00 |
| Material | stated assumption | $40.00 |
| Base internal cost | 150 + 250 + 40 | $440.00 |
| Price at 25% markup | 440 × 1.25 | $550.00 |
Sources and limits
Claims are dated where they can change. Product calculations are examples from the stated inputs, not a promise about a customer's quote. Competitor wording is attributed to the source shown.
- DDTC says a person engaged in the United States in the business of manufacturing defense articles must register under ITAR §122.1, subject to exemptions, and that registration does not grant export rights. — source (checked 2026-10-30)
Price one of your own parts
Drop a PDF drawing or a STEP file. QuotedPart reads the print, measures the model and prices it in seconds, on default shop rates you can change.
Your STEP file or PDF drawingDrop a PDF drawing, a STEP file or both
Free. No account, no email. Priced at our default US rates until you set yours.
Related QuotedPart guides
Answers
Can a customer email ITAR drawings? Gmail, Dropbox and safer quoting paths
How to pause an ITAR drawing transfer, ask the customer for an approved method and keep a quote moving without guessing at export-control compliance.
Answers
Can I use cloud quoting software for ITAR parts?
Maybe, but only if ITAR technical data is protected the way 22 CFR 120.54(a)(5) requires, or the provider meets the access rules itself. What the encryption carve-out says, what to ask any cloud vendor, and how an ITAR vault fits.
Answers
A customer wants a cost breakdown of your machine-shop quote
Decide what to disclose, protect confidential methods and still give the buyer a useful scope and price explanation.
Answers
Average machine shop rates in 2026: what the published numbers show
A dated table of published US machine-rate examples and a transparent break-even worksheet; there is no single national average.